Random Post: get_results("SELECT ID,post_title,guid FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_status= \"publish\" ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1"); $p=$post[0]; echo ('' . $p->post_title . ''); ?>
RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About
  •  

    The Associated Press: Shift on marriage energizes immigration activists

    May 15th, 2012

    The Associated Press: Shift on marriage energizes immigration activists.

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — President Barack Obama’s shift to support gay marriage is energizing young Hispanic voters who have been working side-by-side with gay activists in their push for immigration reform. The alliance has been growing across the country, helping dispel what many say is an outdated notion that Hispanics are less tolerant of gays than the general public.

    “My members are telling me that we need to learn from the gay community,” said Dee Dee Garcia Blase, founder of the Phoenix-based Somos Republicans. She is now head of the Tequila Party, which she formed last year with the goal of registering young Hispanics to vote for immigration-friendly candidates like Obama.

    “We need to take a lesson from the (lesbian and gay) community with regard to being that loud, squeaky wheel that gets fixed,” Blase said. “We need to be more aggressive, and we realize it.”

    Both the Democratic and Republican parties are focused heavily on winning the Hispanic vote, not just because it holds the key to battleground states but because Latinos make up the fastest-growing minority group. The government projects Hispanics will account for roughly 30 percent of the population by 2050, doubling in size and boosting their political power. Some 600,000 young Hispanics who were born in the U.S. turn 18 each year to enter a widening pool of more than 21 million Hispanic eligible voters.

    Conservative Hispanics see the president’s endorsement of same-sex marriage as an opportunity to draw Latinos to the Republican Party. According to a 2007 religion survey of U.S. Latinos by the Pew Research Center’s Forum on Religion & Public Life, two-thirds of Hispanics said their religious beliefs are an important influence on their political thinking. While more than two-thirds of Hispanics identified themselves as Roman Catholic, 15 percent said they were born-again Protestants. Evangelical Latinos, who cite Biblical teaching for their stance against homosexuality, are twice as likely as those who are Catholic to vote Republican.

    But a poll released in April 2011 by the National Council of La Raza, the nation’s largest Hispanic civil rights advocacy organization, and Social Science Research Solutions, a public opinion research firm, indicated that while 66 percent of those surveyed identified as Roman Catholic, 49 percent favored allowing same-sex marriage and that number climbed to 59 percent in favor of giving gay and lesbian couples the same legal rights as married couples. A surprising 69 percent favored allowing gay or lesbian couples to marry in their church or religious institution and 52 percent did not view homosexuality as a sin, compared to 38 percent who did. Some 69 percent said that good Christians should accept all people as God’s creation and not cast judgment, while 60 percent viewed discrimination against gays and lesbians as a sin. Most of those surveyed, 71 percent, were under the age of 50.

    While George W. Bush won 44 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, by 2008, 67 percent of the Hispanic vote had swung toward Obama. And that vote was pivotal to his success in states like Colorado, where exit polls show Republican Sen. John McCain would have won if only Caucasians had voted.

    For many young Hispanics, both immigrant and U.S.-born, the DREAM Act — the proposed legislation would make students who entered the country without authorization as children eligible for permanent residency and higher education — is a key issue. Obama supports the proposal, while Romney’s hard line against the measure, which he has called a handout, has alienated many Hispanic voters. The Pew Hispanic Center found in a December 2011 survey that 91 percent support the legislation.

    Juan Rodriguez, who is active in the Florida Immigrant Coalition and an immigrant himself, said the gay rights and immigrant rights movements are “very aligned and becoming moreso every year.

    The co-president of Blase’s Tequila Party, Shara Mora James is gay. And two so-called Dreamers, or leaders in the movement to pass DREAM Act, have recently taken over two emerging gay rights groups, Freedom to Work and Get Equal.

    “The immigrant rights movement is grounded on advocating with the most oppressed out of our community, and in many cases, that has been queer undocumented youth,” said Rodriguez. “We are figuring out more and more ways of supporting each other because we all grew up being told we needed to live in fear because of the communities we love.”

    Hispanic leaders and political watchers say they don’t expect Obama’s announcement to have much impact on the Latino vote, which could be key to victory in battleground states like New Mexico, Florida, Nevada and Colorado.

    “No, no, no, no, no. It’s not going to affect my vote,” said Sister “Molly” Maria Luisa Munoz, a Roman Catholic nun in Denver who works with immigrants and the gay and lesbian community. “My mother straightened us out right away,” she said. “God made everybody. How we came out? That’s God’s creation. Nobody should judge.”

    At Barela’s Coffee House in Albuquerque’s predominantly Hispanic South Valley, manager Geri Lucero said when the talk turns to politics there, it’s almost always about the economy.

    “Economics is more important right now because people are struggling with their money,” the 57-year-old said, noting that conversation on the day after Obama’s announcement revolved around two recent pit bull maulings, not gay marriage.

    Will Obama’s stance impact her vote? No, she replied.

    Despite the increased acceptance of homosexuality and same-sex marriage among Hispanics, one of the most recent polls of registered voters on the issue, from Quinnipiac University in July 2011, shows only 37 percent of Hispanics said they would support a law in their state that would allow same-sex couples to get married, compared with 46 percent overall. But a Pew Research Center survey of Latinos in March 2011 showed 59 percent of Hispanics said homosexuality should be accepted by society, compared to 58 percent of the general population.

    Gary Segura, director of Chicano studies at Stanford University, said that even though Hispanics hold more conservative views on family and social issues than the general population, “it’s not how Latinos vote. It’s about jobs, the economy, education.”

    The morning after Obama’s announcement, discussion on a Spanish-language radio station popular with Cuban-Americans in Miami focused on the president’s embrace of same-sex marriage, but most callers seemed more interested in discussing the likely political calculations that went into the decision than in slamming the president for violating their religious principles.

    Delsa Bernardo, who co-owns Yiya’s Gourmet Cuban Bakery and Café in Miami with her life partner, said Obama’s shift has actually re-energized her support for the president. Bernardo said she backed Obama in 2008 but has since become disillusioned with him, mostly over the difficulty she’s had in getting business loans from banks that received the bailouts backed by the president.

    “It might swing my vote more to him because he’s more open on this,” she said.

    Still, some conservative Hispanics said they will use Obama’s endorsement of gay marriage to try to woo more Latinos to the Republican Party.

    About 25 conservatives representing 10 southern Nevada churches met Thursday at the Casa Don Juan restaurant in downtown Las Vegas. The group of pastors, Hispanic activists and social conservatives blasted Obama’s stance, fretting about the future of the family in the United States.

    “He’s destroying the fabric of the family,” said Juan Sclafani, a Republican pastor at the First Spanish Baptist Church in Las Vegas. “His motivation is to get votes, but he doesn’t realize that he is destroying our nation.”

    Alfonso Aguilar, executive director of the Latino Partnership for Conservative Principles in Washington, D.C., said his group expects to use the gay marriage debate to recruit new Hispanic supporters for Romney. They plan to focus on voter registration in Nevada and then branch out to Florida, North Carolina, Colorado and New Mexico.

    Colorado’s Democratic Party Chairman Rick Palacio, who is both gay and Hispanic, said it was difficult to say how Obama’s statements would affect the presidential race in Colorado this year.

    “While it may not be the most politically advantageous decision to make, he made the right decision,” Palacio said. “I think that’s more important than anything else. He’s putting the right thing to do ahead of politics.”


    Results of 2011 (“DV 2013″) Green Card Lottery (Diversity Visa Program) Announced!

    May 11th, 2012

    The US State Department (www.dvlottery.state.gov/esc) has posted all results of last year’s Diversity Immigrant Visa Program, also known as the Green Card Lottery. All applicants who completed their registrations through USA Green Card have already received their results via email. You can now prepare your early registration for the next program. You can learn more and register at http://www.usa-green-card.com


    DV2013 Lottery Results Expected Soon

    May 3rd, 2012

    The results of the DV-2013 US Visa Lottery are expected to be announced in the next few days.  If you registered in the calendar year 2011 program, known as the “DV-2013″ lottery, then you will be able to check your results at the DV Lottery web site using your registration confirmation number here:  https://www.dvlottery.state.gov/

    If you registered with USA Green Card, you will also receive an email with your results in the coming days.  You can always login to your account to check your status as well:  http://www.usa-green-card.com/GC2_AccountAdminLogin.aspx

    The US Government had previously announced that the results would be ready on or about May 1, 2012.  As of today, Thursday, May 3, 2012, the US State Department HAS NOT YET PUBLISHED RESULTS.  As soon as these are ready, information will be posted here.


    Mitt Romney will ‘study and consider’ Marco Rubio’s Republican alternative to the DREAM Act – Political Intelligence – A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe – Boston.com

    April 18th, 2012

    Mitt Romney will ‘study and consider’ Marco Rubio’s Republican alternative to the DREAM Act – Political Intelligence – A national political and campaign blog from The Boston Globe – Boston.com.

    Mitt Romney’s campaign said Wednesday that the presumptive Republican presidential nominee will “study and consider” the immigration bill outlined by Florida Senator Marco Rubio but stopped short of offering an endorsement.

     

    Rubio, a rising GOP star rumored to be a possible running mate for Romney, said Tuesday that he is putting together a conservative alternative to the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act. That bill, supported by Democrats and popular among Latinos, would facilitate citizenship for illegal immigrant youths who enroll in college or enlist in the military.

     

    The plan by Rubio, the son of Cuban exiles, would allow these young illegal immigrants to stay in the United States but would deny them citizenship.

     

    The Wall Street Journal and NBC News reported that Romney cited a Republican version of the DREAM Act as an important overture to Hispanic voters when he spoke Sunday at a private fundraiser in Palm Beach, Fla. Romney opposes the DREAM Act as written.

     

    Rubio said Tuesday that he did not consult Romney before drawing up his plan, but added that “it’s important for him to feel comfortable with and be supportive of whatever endeavor we pursue.”

    Though stricter than the DREAM Act, Rubio’s proposal still might conflict with Romney’s firm stance on illegal immigration.

    “I’d build a fence, I’d hire border patrol agents to secure it, I’d make sure that we crack down on employers that hire people who are here illegally and make sure they use a system like E-Verify,” Romney said last week at a rally in Warwick, R.I.

     

    Romney’s position on immigration has contributed to his deficit among Hispanic voters. A Pew Research Center poll released Tuesday showed 67 percent of registered Latino voters support President Obama, compared to only 27 percent who back Romney.

     

    Lately, Romney has stressed his support of legal immigration and has said the Republican Party, not the Democratic Party, is “the pro-immigration party.”

     

    “We are the party that values legal immigration,” he said in Warwick, where he spoke for several minutes about immigration. “We welcome people coming here legally; it’s a source of strength for us. Theirs is the party that talks about it, but does nothing about it. I want to make sure we stop illegal immigration, so we can protect legal immigration.”

     

    Romney said immigrants do not have to abandon their native languages but should be able to speak English. To underscore the point, he said Puerto Rico Governor Luis Fortuno, a Republican, had told him that “Spanish is the language of our heritage, and English is the language of opportunity.”

     

    Romney also extended a special invitation to highly educated foreign nationals, saying “if you have advanced degrees from accredited universities here or elsewhere, I’d staple a green card to their diploma.”

     

    Romney’s campaign said he would review “any proposals on immigration from his Republican partners.”

     

    “We must work together on protecting and strengthening legal immigration, securing our borders, ending illegal immigration in a civil but resolute manner, and ensuring that any reforms do not encourage further illegal immigration,” Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in a statement.


    Demand Rises for H1-B Skilled-Worker Visas – WSJ.com

    April 10th, 2012

    Demand Rises for H1-B Skilled-Worker Visas – WSJ.com.

    In a sign of the improving economy, the U.S. government saw a sharp rise in petitions for skilled-foreign-worker visas during the first week of this year’s application season.

    The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services has received 25,600 petitions for H-1B visas since April 2, nearly twice as many as it received for the entire first month of last year’s application period.

    The agency began accepting H-1B petitions last week for jobs with a start date of Oct. 1 or later, typically in computer programming, engineering and other high-tech fields where there is sometimes a shortage of qualified Americans.

    “Given the improved economy…it would not be surprising to see the quota filled very early this year,” said Stuart Anderson, executive director of the National Foundation for American Policy, an Arlington, Va., group that studies the H-1 program.

    The H-1Bs fall into two categories. Each year, a maximum 65,000 visas are granted in a general category of skilled workers. An additional 20,000 H-1Bs are allotted to foreign nationals who hold an advanced degree.

    Last week, the immigration agency received 17,400 petitions in the general category and 8,200 in the advanced category, for individuals who usually have a Master’s degree.

    In contrast, last year in the first week, the government received 5,900 H-1B petitions counting toward the 65,000 cap, and about 4,500 petitions for the 20,000 visas set aside for people with advanced degrees.

    In all of April 2011, the government received a total of about 14,000 petitions in the two categories.

    In the first application week in 2010, the agency received 13,500 general petitions and 5,600 petitions for individuals with advanced degrees.

    Demand for the skilled-worker visas has fluctuated in past years, with the visa limit exhausted on the first few days of filing in 2007 and 2008.

    That demand decreased during the economic crisis and its aftermath. In recent years, some lawmakers, including Sens. Chuck Grassley (R., Iowa) and Richard Durbin (D., Ill.), have expressed concern about the visa program and whether foreign workers, especially in the software sector, are displacing qualified Americans.

    But the increased visa applications mirror a pickup in activity for related businesses.

    “We’re the busiest we have been in four years,” said Steve Miller, a Seattle attorney who specializes in business immigration. His clients include large and midsize tech companies, as well as architecture firms.

    “We’re seeing a widespread increase in hiring of new employees,” he said, adding that there appears to be “greater competition in the marketplace for top talent.”


    Immigration officials arrest more than 3,100 – Boston.com

    April 3rd, 2012

    Immigration officials arrest more than 3,100 – Boston.com.

    WASHINGTON—The Obama administration said Monday it arrested more than 3,100 immigrants who were illegally in the country and who were convicted of serious crimes or otherwise considered fugitives or threats to national security. It was part of a six-day nationwide sweep that the government described as the largest of its kind.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement said the sweep included every state and involved more than 1,900 of the agency’s officers and agents.

    The sweep comes nearly a year after ICE pledged to focus on deporting illegal immigrants with serious criminal histories and those who posed national security threats, while going easier on many who stay out of trouble. The agency’s director, John Morton, said the arrests underscored that focus.

    “There are 3,168 fewer criminal aliens and egregious immigration law violators in our neighborhoods,” Morton said.

    Officials said most of those arrested had entered the country illegally. Others had violated the terms for legally being in the United States and were subject to deportation.

    More than 1,000 of the people arrested had multiple criminal convictions. The most severe cases included murder, manslaughter, drug trafficking and sexual crimes against minors.

    The totals included an estimated 50 gang members and 149 convicted sex offenders. The cases of at least 204 of them were referred to federal prosecutors for a variety of serious charges, including illegal re-entry after deportation, a felony that can carry up to 20 years in prison.

    Morton issued guidelines in June that suggested the agency would ease up on illegal immigrants who are military veterans, elderly, in the United States since childhood or had relatives who were citizens or legal residents. In August, the Department of Homeland Security announced a review of about 300,000 cases in the nation’s clogged immigration courts aimed at giving reprieves to the lowest-priority offenders.

    Latinos and other immigrant communities have eyed the pledges warily as the Obama administration has removed record numbers of illegal immigrants — nearly 400,000 in each of the last three years.

    The agents participating in last week’s sweeps typically knock on doors early in the morning before people go to work.

    A San Diego team began Wednesday in a neighborhood of large, cookie-cutter homes, looking for a Laotian man who had convictions for burglary, assault, amphetamine possession and disorderly conduct. After 20 minutes of waiting in unmarked cars, a person emerged who told law enforcement that their target wasn’t home.

    From there, the agents went to a modest neighborhood in suburban Chula Vista to look for a Cuban who had convictions for involuntary manslaughter, battery, vehicle theft and spousal abuse. A resident said the man moved, and a next-door neighbor corroborated.

    The third stop finally produced an arrest — a Somali man who was on supervised release for a drug conviction. He was living at a halfway house in San Diego.

    In all, the San Diego agents targeted 14 illegal immigrants and found six. They arrested six others who were not targets, increasing the day’s arrest tally to 12. Lauren Mack, a spokeswoman for ICE, said the non-targets either had deportation orders or were previously removed from the United States.

    The sweep included 116 different nationalities and represented the third such sweep under the program called Operation Cross Check. The last sweep resulted in the arrest of about 2,900 people.


    Army Reserve Brothers Set To Become US Citizens | Fox News

    March 30th, 2012

    Army Reserve Brothers Set To Become US Citizens | Fox News.

    Two brothers assigned with the U.S. Army Reserve and originally from the Philippines are set to become U.S. citizens.

    Rashniv and Odini Ramos are scheduled Wednesday to be naturalized during a special ceremony at the New Mexico Veterans’ Memorial in Albuquerque.

    According to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, military members with at least one year of service can apply for naturalization.

    A naturalization applicant must be a person of good moral character, understand English and have a basic knowledge of U.S. history and government.


    Democrats Take Aim at Rubio-Romney on Immigration – Yahoo! News

    March 30th, 2012

    Democrats Take Aim at Rubio-Romney on Immigration.

    Democrats have a plan if Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida becomes the first Hispanic on a national ticket: wage a policy battle over immigration.

    The strategy has been emerging since the Cuban-American rising star was elected to the Senate in 2010, and it became more apparent after Rubio endorsed Republican front-runner Mitt Romney on Wednesday evening.

    The Democratic National Committee immediately responded to Rubio’s endorsement with a statement chiding him and Romney for opposing legislation, backed by President Obama, that would offer citizenship to undocumented workers who enroll in college or join the military.

    “Rubio’s support for Romney underscores what we already knew: Mitt Romney would have the most extreme immigration platform of any presidential nominee in recent history,” said the DNC statement. The line of attack was picked up on Thursday by prominent Hispanic Democrats in a call with reporters organized by the Florida Democratic Party.

    “The fact that your last name ends in a vowel isn’t enough. You have to side with Hispanic voters on the issues, and that includes the Dream Act and immigration reform,” Democratic consultant Freddy Balsera, an Obama adviser on Hispanic issues, told National Journal.

    The Democratic attacks on Rubio are laying the groundwork for an unprecedented battle for the hearts and minds of the increasingly influential Hispanic vote. While Democrats aim to win over Hispanic voters by pushing a policy debate over immigration, Republicans are likely to play up Rubio’s compelling personal story as the child of immigrants.

    It’s head versus heart. The Dream Act versus the American dream. Look no further than the messaging from the Romney campaign.

    “Marco Rubio is living proof that the American dream is still very much alive,” reads the statement thanking Rubio for his endorsement. “From humble origins, he has risen to become one of the brightest lights in our political party.’’

    After leaving Cuba for the United States in 1956, Rubio’s parents ultimately settled in Miami. His father worked as a bartender and his mother as a hotel maid and a store clerk. Rubio graduated from law school and became the first Cuban-American leader of the Florida House. Rubio’s father died two months before he defeated Florida’s sitting governor in the U.S. Senate race. The charismatic Rubio has repeatedly denied interest in the vice presidency, insisting he wants to serve in the Senate.

    “There’s an aspirational quality to Marco that he transmits to other Latinos,” said Ana Navarro, Hispanic adviser to John McCain’s 2008 presidential campaign. “When he speaks so eloquently about his parents, the immigrant experience, freedom, his experience growing up in a humble immigrant home, I have seen many handkerchiefs around me.”

    In recent weeks, as Romney has inched closer to the nomination and speculation has increased about Rubio topping the vice presidential short list, the senator has sought to blunt criticism of his position on the Dream Act. He’s suggested he might support a watered-down version that would offer legal status without a pathway to citizenship. “I do want to help out these kids. The Dream Act is a way to help them out,” Rubio said in an interview earlier this month with television personality Geraldo Rivera.

    Romney has also tried to soften his position on the proposal. In a nationally televised debate a week before the Florida primary, he suggested he might support the legislation for illegal immigrants who enlist in the military. But in the same debate, pressed about what he would do about the millions of illegal immigrants currently in the country, Romney advocated cracking down on their employers and a process of “self-deportation.”

    When it comes to immigration policy, Rubio and Romney have followed a similar track. As they have risen in national prominence, their positions have grown more conservative, mirroring the Republican Party’s rightward shift in recent years.

    Before his 2008 presidential bid, the former governor of Massachusetts made statements that suggested he favored giving illegal immigrants a pathway to citizenship. But he has subsequently taken a hard-line stance against “amnesty” and attacked his former rival, Gov. Rick Perry, for signing a Texas law that offered in-state college tuition to illegal immigrants. He also ran television ads attacking former Sen. Rick Santorum for approving a federal appointment for Sonia Sotomayor, who went on to become the first Puerto Rican justice on the Supreme Court.

    Rubio’s political rhetoric has also changed. Several bills that would have cracked down on illegal immigration died under his leadership of the Florida House. And he initially expressed concern about an Arizona law allowing local police officers to demand citizenship papers.

    But as Rubio’s national stature in the tea party movement grew, he increasingly emphasized his opposition to amnesty. In October, he pulled back his previous support for tuition breaks for the children of illegal immigrants — even though he had sponsored such a bill in Florida as a state representative.

    Pro-immigration and Democratic groups have been quick to seize on any inconsistencies in Rubio’s public statements on Hispanic issues. America’s Voice, which advocates citizenship for undocumented workers, blasted an e-mail on Thursday that said: “Rubio’s second-class Dream Act won’t save Mitt Romney with Latino voters.”

    A Fox News poll of Hispanic voters earlier this month found 70 percent favored President Obama compared to only 14 percent for Romney. Nine out of 10 Hispanic voters said they support the Dream Act; more than eight out of 10 voters said they back a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants.

    Hispanics are the fastest growing slice of the electorate and could swing the 2012 vote in several battleground states, including Florida, Colorado, Nevada, and New Mexico.

    “If Mitt Romney puts a Hispanic candidate on the ticket, I don’t think Hispanic voters are going to look at that and say, ‘Oh yeah,’ and ignore the fact that he opposes the Dream Act,” said Obama’s campaign pollster, Joel Benenson. “If you’ve been espousing the policies they have that are pretty harsh on immigration, to think that you can turn your vote numbers around by putting someone on the ticket because they’re Hispanic” won’t work, he said.

    Republicans argue that Hispanics, like other voters, care about the economy first and foremost and say the election will be a referendum on the president.

    “Perhaps President Obama’s pollster should survey the opinions of the 24 million Americans who are either out of work or underemployed. What he would find is that Hispanics and other minorities have been disproportionately impacted by Obama’s failed economic policies and they are desperately looking for someone like Mitt Romney to create jobs and turn around this bad economy,” said Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul.


    Tech Titans Aid Undocumented Students – WSJ.com

    March 6th, 2012

    Tech Titans Aid Undocumented Students – WSJ.com.

    A group of Silicon Valley technology leaders, impatient with attempts to rewrite immigration laws, is funding efforts to help undocumented youths attend college, find jobs and stay in the country despite their illegal status.

    The group includes Jeff Hawkins, inventor of the Palm Pilot; and the family foundations of Andrew Grove, co-founder of Intel Corp.; and Mark Leslie, founder of the former Veritas Software Corp. Laurene Powell Jobs, widow of Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Jobs, has for years supported undocumented students through her organizations that help low-income high-school students.

    The Silicon Valley money is part of a broader response by individuals and states to Congress, which hasn’t passed the Dream Act. That federal legislation would offer a path to legalization for illegal immigrants who graduate from a U.S. high school and attend college or join the military.

    “We think Congress’s inaction…is devastating for these students and tragic for the country,” said Ms. Powell Jobs, who was one of the first in the tech community to champion the Dream Act by lobbying her congresswoman and writing an op-ed piece supporting the legislation.

    The focus of the Silicon Valley philanthropists is Educators for Fair Consideration, or E4FC, a nonprofit that gives scholarships, career advice and legal services to students brought to the U.S. illegally as children.

    Companies that knowingly hire illegal immigrants can face civil and criminal penalties. Among other ideas, the Silicon Valley donors are studying the possibility of using unpaid internships as way for students to come to the attention of employers who might later sponsor them for a legal work visa.

    After helping a few dozen students through college with small donations, the San Francisco-based organization expanded with money from the tech leaders. It now has enlisted immigration attorneys to offer legal advice to hundreds of undocumented students.

    “We used to think, ‘Let’s just get them through college’” with scholarships, said Katharine Gin, a teacher who founded E4FC along with a college counselor. “We thought the federal Dream Act would pass and we would be helping these students in the interim period only.”

    Several of the Silicon Valley supporters became aware of the issue close up: Mr. Hawkins got to know an undocumented student at his daughters’ high school. Liz Simons, daughter of the founder of hedge fund Renaissance Technologies, mentored an undocumented honor student in high school who was struggling to raise funds for college because of his illegal status. Seth Leslie, son of Veritas’s founder, had encountered undocumented students in his work as a schoolteacher and principal.

    The money involved is relatively small: The tech philanthropists and others gave hundreds of thousands dollars in the last year to the group, whose 2012 operating budget is $600,000.

    “I have chosen to make this one of my philanthropic areas,” said Mr. Hawkins, who disclosed his giving for the first time in an interview but declined to state the amount. “It’s still at an embryonic stage; I’m willing to crank it up as we find solutions.”

    California, Illinois and New York in recent months passed bills that enable undocumented students to receive financial aid for college. Thirteen states allow illegal immigrants who reside in their borders to pay in-state fees at public universities.

    Despite bipartisan support in the past, the Dream Act never passed Congress after it became caught up in the broader debate over reshaping the nation’s immigration system, including what to do with the estimated 11 million people in the country illegally. The latest version of the Dream Act was passed by the House in December 2010 but failed in the Senate, after it was tacked onto a defense-spending bill.

    To opponents, the bill is tantamount to an amnesty program for children whose parents broke U.S. immigration laws; they argue it would entice more people to sneak into the country. President Barack Obama supports the Dream Act; Republican Mitt Romney has said he would veto the measure if elected president.

    On hearing of the efforts by the group, Ira Mehlman, a spokesman for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, a national group that lobbies against legalization, said: “You’d think they would help people in the country legally who face difficult times getting a start.”

    About 65,000 undocumented students graduate from U.S. high schools each year, according to experts who follow the issue. The Supreme Court has ruled it unconstitutional to deny a K-12 public education to children who are in the country illegally.

    But after that, their future is uncertain because they can’t qualify for federal grants, work-study programs or bank loans to finance college nor can they obtain work legally.

    U.S. tech companies have long backed raising the number of visas the government issues for skilled immigrants such as software engineers, and argue the country is losing its competitive edge as other economies attract skilled labor forces.

    At a recent gathering in Los Altos, Calif., an undocumented 23-year-old with a degree in civil engineering, which he obtained on a scholarship, told funders of E4FC that he had five job offers in the last two months, only to have them revoked because of his immigration status. He said he has been willing to work for no pay to accrue experience required for a professional engineering license. Even that has proved challenging.

    The U.S. has “put a lot of money into [undocumented students] already,” said Eva Grove, wife of Intel’s co-founder, whose family foundation gave $1 million to immigration-related groups last year. “It makes no sense to dead-end them after they are educated.”


    Mitt Romney in talks over nationwide version of tough state immigration laws | World news | guardian.co.uk

    February 24th, 2012

    Mitt Romney in talks over nationwide version of tough state immigration laws | World news | guardian.co.uk.

     

    Mitt Romney has discussed the possibility of imposing a nationwide crackdown on undocumented aliens, a move that his leading immigration adviser believes could force more than a million people to quit the country every year.

    Kris Kobach, the source of some of Romney’s most controversial ideas on immigration, has told the Guardian that he has been in direct discussions with the presidential candidate about possible changes to federal policy should Romney win the Republican nomination and go on to take the White House.

    The changes would see “attrition through enforcement” – the state-level clampdown pioneered by Kobach in Arizona, Alabama and several other states – extended across the entire US in an attempt to winkle undocumented workers out of the country.

    Kobach estimates that within the first four years of a new Republican presidency, as many as half of the current pool of undocumented aliens – some 5.5 million – could be made to flee by introducing much more aggressive enforcement of immigration documents.

    The idea is to make the legal environment so hostile to undocumented families, and work so hard to come by, that they will choose to depart of their own volition – “self-deportation”, as Kobach calls it.

    Kobach, who has been dubbed the “dark lord of the anti-illegal immigration movement”, was co-author of tough new laws in Arizona, Alabama, Missouri and Oklahoma. He has also advised Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia on how to toughen up their policies.

    The aggressive nature of these immigration measures has pitted the federal government against the states, with the justice department intervening directly by suing Arizona to halt its law. The case will be decided by the US supreme court this summer.

    Despite these legal battles, Kobach now hopes to influence the federal approach to immigration in the event of a Romney presidency.

    “I have advised Romney directly, and his close team around him, that attrition through enforcement has been working, that self-deportation has been observed in Arizona and Alabama, and that this really does need to be part of our national effort,” he said.

    Kobach added that “you could reasonably expect that in the first four years of a new administration, if attrition through enforcement were made the centrepiece of national immigration policy, you could see the illegal alien population cut in half.”

    The prospect of more than 5 million undocumented immigrants, mostly Mexican, quitting America within the first term of a Romney administration puts into perspective the charged nature of the immigration debate within this year’s primary season. Romney has made a hard line on immigration a central plank of his campaign for the nomination.

    In Thursday night’s Republican debate in Mesa, Arizona, he praised the state’s controversial law SB 1070, calling it a “model for the nation”. SB 1070, the law currently under review by the supreme court following a challenge from the Obama administration, would require police officers to check the status of anyone they stop should they have a “reasonable suspicion” that the person is in the US without permission.

    Romney also praised the 2007 law that penalises Arizonan businesses for employing unauthorised workers – a system known as E-Verify. He told the debate: “I will make sure we have an E-Verify system and require employers to check the documents of workers. If an employer hires someone that has not gone through E-Verify, they’re going to get sanctioned just like they do for not paying their taxes.”

    Romney’s stance on immigration is mirrored by that of his main rival Rick Santorum. However, it is in stark contrast to that of Newt Gingrich, who has said he favours a limited amnesty for those who have lived in the US for many years, and has derided the concept of “self-deportation” as a fantasy.

    Romney has aligned himself publicly with Kobach who acts as his unpaid adviser and who endorsed him in January. The two men went on the campaign trail in South Carolina last month, after which Romney hailed Kobach as “a true leader on securing our borders”.

    Kobach, who is secretary of state in Kansas, has become the target in recent months of protests from Hispanic and immigration reform groups, such as America’s Voice, that have accused him of being an extremist and of waging a legal vendetta against Latino communities in the US.

    “It’s not suprising you get people who engage in simplistic ad hominem attacks,” Kobach said. “They do that when they are running out of ideas.”

    Kobach said he expects Romney to take the fight over immigration policy to Barack Obama should he win the Republican nomination. “I think he would take this to the campaign stump in the general election, as this is a strong point of contrast with the Obama administration.”

    Asked to give his definition of a successful immigration policy, Kobach replied: “One that America solves our illegal immigration problem and restores the rule of law. One that takes specific steps to give illegal immigrants incentives to leave on their own, and that makes it very difficult for them to obtain employment.”

    He pointed to Arizona’s clampdown on jobs for unauthorised workers, which prompted a 16% decline in the state’s population of undocumented families between 2008 and 2010 – more than twice the national rate.

    He said that if the same policies were replicated at a federal level they could result in a mass exodus of undocumented immigrants. “If we did that on a national level it would have a massive effect – causing people to self-deport, discouraging illegal aliens from entering the country, because they would know it would be really tough to get a job.”

    Kobach, who took a doctorate in politics from Brasenose college, Oxford, has a rowing oar from his 1991 Isis crew on the wall of his state office, along with the heads of two deer that he shot, he says, with a bow.

    After Oxford he studied law at Yale and went on to become a law professor specialising in issues of citizenship. His interest in immigration policy deepened as a result of 9/11, when he was working in the justice department within the Bush administration.

    He said he was struck by the revelation that five of the 19 hijackers had been in the US illegally, and of those three were pilots. “If our immigration system had been more effective we could have stopped three of the four pilots from taking off that day. That was a real awakening for me,” he said.

    Of his many legal forays into state-level immigration rules, the most controversial has been the provision in Alabama’s HB 56 that instructs school teachers to check the legal status of their pupils. There were reports – which Kobach described as “vague” – of thousands of Hispanic parents taking their children out of school for fear of the consequences.

    Kobach said that the provision would not deny education to any undocumented children. But he did admit that some children would have to be taken out of school as a consequence of “self-deportation”, even in cases where the children were born in the US and thus had US citizenship. “We want families to stay together, so obviously where a family has school-aged children their departure would also be inevitable,” he said.