Random Post: get_results("SELECT ID,post_title,guid FROM $wpdb->posts WHERE post_status= \"publish\" ORDER BY RAND() LIMIT 1"); $p=$post[0]; echo ('' . $p->post_title . ''); ?>
RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About
  •  

    US back to denying same sex couple visas – WSJ.com

    March 31st, 2011

    US back to denying same sex couple visas – WSJ.com.

    WASHINGTON — After a brief reprieve, U.S. immigration authorities are once again denying applications for immigration benefits for same-sex couples following a legal review.

    Chris Bentley, a spokesman for the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services agency, said Wednesday that after a review by lawyers from the Homeland Security Department, it was concluded that a law prohibiting the government from recognizing same sex marriages must be followed, despite the Obama administration’s decision to stop defending the constitutionality of the law in court.

    The law, the Defense of Marriage Act, defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.

    Earlier this week, USCIS announced that applications from foreigners married to a U.S. citizen of the same sex would be held in “abeyance” while the legal review proceeded. Bentley said Tuesday that the temporary hold on application decisions was not a change in policy.

    In February, Attorney General Eric Holder announcement that the government would no longer defend the law, which gay rights activists have said is discriminatory.

    Bob Deasy, of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said the latest ruling is a “disappointment.”

    “The administration has the authority to put these cases on hold” while the fate of the marriage law is decided in court, he said.

    Holder’s announcement appears to have already had an impact on at least one immigration case.

    Earlier this month a New York-based immigration judge decided to postpone a deportation order against an Argentine lesbian married to a U.S. citizen.

    Following the ruling to adjourn the case until December, Monica Alcota’s lawyer, Noemi Masliah, praised the judge’s decision.

    “The right thing to do, and this judge did do the right thing, is to adjourn this case and see what happens down the road,” Masliah said. “Given that the law is so up in the air … it’s hard to enforce at this point in a negative way.”

    Wednesday’s announcement did not have any immediate impact on Alcota’s case.


    Immigration Officials Try to Clarify Position on Gay Marriage – NYTimes.com

    March 30th, 2011

    Immigration Officials Try to Clarify Position on Gay Marriage – NYTimes.com.

    An announcement by immigration officials in Washington on Monday that they were delaying decisions on some immigration cases involving gay couples led to a surge of expectations among gay advocates that the Obama administration had taken a small but significant step toward recognizing same-sex marriage.

    But on Tuesday, immigration officials moved swiftly to clarify their position and dampen those hopes, saying they have not made any policy changes that would provide an opening to gay couples. The episode added to the legal confusion that has followed the administration’s determination last month that the law that bars the federal government from recognizing gay marriages, the Defense of Marriage Act, is unconstitutional.

    In this case, the misunderstandings and soaring hopes arose from an effort in recent days by officials at Citizenship and Immigration Services, the federal agency that awards immigration status, to clarify their policy on granting permanent residency green cards to immigrants legally married to American citizens who are gay. While it is routine for American citizens in heterosexual couples to obtain green cards for their foreign spouses, the Defense of Marriage Act has barred such status for immigrants in same-sex marriages.

    That situation has long been a focus of criticism by gay rights groups, who argue that the law is particularly discriminatory against immigrants. “If you are in a bi-national couple that is heterosexual, you get to stay here and work here,” said Richard Socarides, a lawyer who is president of Equality Matters, a gay rights advocacy group. “If you are gay, you get deported.”

    In February, President Obama and Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. announced that the administration would no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act in the courts, although it would continue to enforce the law, which was adopted in 1996, until it is changed by the courts or by Congress.

    The position has led to a host of dilemmas for federal agencies that continue to enforce the law. This month, Immigration Equality, a group that advocates for immigrants in gay couples, wrote to immigration officials urging them to suspend deportations of immigrants in same-sex marriages and suspend other cases involving gay couples until the courts render a final decision on the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act.

    The most recent crossed signals started at meetings last week between immigration lawyers and officials from Citizenship and Immigration Services. The officials said that some cases involving gay married couples had been suspended while the agency sought guidance from its lawyers about issues related to the marriage act.

    On Monday, Christopher S. Bentley, the chief spokesman for the immigration agency, confirmed in a statement that cases nationwide involving married gay couples had been suspended. What Mr. Bentley did not say was how long that hold might last and what issues the agency was seeking to clarify.

    But the elated reaction among gay advocates and couples was immediate. Describing Mr. Bentley’s statement as “a darn big deal,” Rachel B. Tiven, the executive director of Immigration Equality, called it “the first domino to fall” for gay American citizens with foreign spouses.

    Ms. Tiven said she understood that immigrants in married gay couples could now apply for green cards and instead of being automatically denied, their cases would be suspended until the courts decided the validity of the marriage act.

    Word also went out across the country. In Princeton, N.J., Josh Vandiver and Henry Velandia, in the middle of a public forum on immigration issues, embraced and cheered. They said they had heard from their immigration lawyer that the agency’s announcement might mean at least a temporary reprieve from deportation for Mr. Velandia.

    Mr. Vandiver, 29, is an American citizen and a political science graduate student at Princeton. He and Mr. Velandia, 27, who is from Venezuela, were married last August in Connecticut, one of the states that recognize same-sex marriages. Their application for a green card for Mr. Velandia was recently denied, and he is facing deportation as early as May.

    But on Tuesday, Mr. Bentley issued a new statement, saying that Citizenship and Immigration Services “has not implemented any change in policy and intends to follow the president’s directive to continue enforcing the law.”

    Mr. Bentley said the agency’s field offices had suspended cases for a short period, perhaps a week or two, while lawyers clarified a “narrow legal issue” concerning the marriage act. He said the agency would probably resume action on same-sex marriage cases in coming days and would continue to deny immigration status to foreigners based on those marriages.

    Immigration lawyers tried on Tuesday to sort out the meaning of the events.

    “We have to be very cautious,” said Lavi S. Soloway, a lawyer who represents Mr. Velandia and Mr. Vandiver. He said gay couples should continue to understand that “if they file for immigration status, they may be putting themselves at considerable risk of deportation.”

    Mr. Velandia, a dancer, formed a dance company in Princeton, HotSalsaHot, and teaches salsa classes there.

    Mr. Vandiver said he and Mr. Velandia do not see an alternative to living in the United States.

    “The prospect of Henry’s deportation is extremely frightening,” he said. “We are committed to staying together, but the world is really closed to us. We both think it’s dangerous to return to Venezuela as a same-sex married couple.”


    Little-Known Colleges Exploit Visa Loopholes to Make Millions Off Foreign Students – Global – The Chronicle of Higher Education

    March 25th, 2011

    Little-Known Colleges Exploit Visa Loopholes to Make Millions Off Foreign Students – Global – The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Early on a Friday morning, four college students stand shivering in the parking lot of an office complex in Sterling, Va. The building itself is unremarkable, red brick and dark glass, but security cameras are bolted to the walls, cement posts line the perimeter, and coils of concertina wire surround the trash bins. This is a branch of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the investigative arm of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.

    The students arrived more than an hour early for their appointment. They haven’t slept or eaten in two days, passing time instead by obsessively organizing their documents and drinking cup after cup of strong black tea. Their eyelids are at half- mast, their hands shoved in jacket pockets. They are all Indian, all from the city of Hyderabad, and all possibly in deep trouble.

    These students, like roughly 1,500 others from India, were enrolled at Tri-Valley University, a California institution that was raided by federal agents in January. The government seized property, threatened to deport students, and in legal filings called Tri-Valley a “sham university” that admitted and collected tuition from foreign students but didn’t require them to attend class. (The president of Tri-Valley, Susan Xiao-Ping Su, denies the charges.) Many students allegedly worked full-time, low-level retail jobs—in one case, at a 7-Eleven in New Jersey—that were passed off as career training so they could be employed while on student visas. The university listed 553 students as living in a single two-bedroom apartment near the college; in fact, students were spread out across the country, from Texas to Illinois to Maryland.

    As the students move inside and await their interview, a deliveryman wheels in a hand truck stacked with nine boxes of .44-caliber ammunition. On a table nearby rests a brochure titled “Targeting Terrorists,” which features the famous image of Mohammed Atta breezing through airport security. When an agent emerges and asks who is going to be first, the four students stare at the carpet. “Come on,” the agent says, trying to break the tension. “No one is going to beat you with a rubber hose.”

    The joke does not go over well.

    The raid on Tri-Valley received limited attention in the United States, but it was and remains a big story in India, where newspapers and television shows portray U.S. officials as callous, and oversight of the student-visa program as incompetent. After weeks of bad publicity, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton felt compelled to assure Indian officials that the situation would be resolved fairly. Meanwhile, immigration officials have pointed to the shuttering of Tri-Valley as proof of their vigilance.

    While these institutions are well-known among Indian students looking to work full time, they have managed to go mostly unnoticed in the United States. That anonymity is just fine with Daniel Ho, the owner of the University of Northern Virginia, an unaccredited college that has called itself the most popular American university for Indian students. Says Mr. Ho: “We don’t want people to know us.”

    Too Good to Be True

    Visitors to Tri-Valley University’s Web site are told of the “championship golf courses and fine vineyards” that surround the campus in Pleasanton, outside San Francisco, not to mention the “gentle hills” and “historical oaks.” Students will receive “fluent and skilful [sic] capability of practical application tool.” In a section listing reasons to attend Tri-Valley, supposedly the most frequent comment from students is “It seems too good to be true, but it is very TRUE!”

    According to immigration officials, Tri-Valley was too good to be true. The federal complaint against the university accuses Susan Xiao-Ping Su, Tri-Valley’s president and founder, of running a scheme that charged students tuition but didn’t make them attend class. In essence, the complaint says, Ms. Su was selling permission to live and work in the United States on student visas. Ms. Su denies this, and a number of former Tri-Valley students say they were taking classes and believed the university was legitimate.

    But even a cursory examination of Tri-Valley reveals problems. The Web site is rife with misspellings, creative grammar, and apparent untruths. It says, for example, that the university is accredited by the International Association of Bible Colleges and Seminaries, but an official there said Tri-Valley was never a member and that the association doesn’t offer accreditation. Purported faculty members who appear on Tri-Valley’s Web site say they never taught there. One of the four members of the university’s advisory board, Sung Hu, a professor of electrical engineering at San Francisco State University, say that while he accepted an invitation from Ms. Su to be an adviser years ago, the board had never met.

    How could such a transparently troubled institution become certified by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to enroll international students? As Tri-Valley officials discovered, loopholes and vague wording in the rules make it relatively easy for an upstart university to get approval.

    While it lacked accreditation, the university says that it met an alternative measure of quality: Its credits were accepted by three other accredited colleges. Federal officials did not find out until more than a year after it approved Tri-Valley in 2009 that two of those three colleges denied ever having had such agreements, the government’s lawsuit says. (Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials declined to comment on Tri-Valley’s certification, citing the open investigation.)

    Federal officials conducted a site visit at Tri-Valley to ensure that the college was real. But federal guidelines say the certification visit need take only two to three hours, and some educators called such appraisals, often conducted by contractors, superficial. What’s more, California lawmakers had allowed a law authorizing a state agency with oversight of for-profit colleges to expire, leaving no one on the ground to monitor Tri-Valley. On a site visit in 2008, federal officials found the college, housed in a pedestrian-looking office, had capacity for about 30 students. By the end of last year, Tri-Valley had enrolled 1,500, the complaint says.

    The university was able to absorb such a huge number of students, the complaint alleges, by granting them the right to take virtually all of their coursework online, despite a federal regulation that restricts foreign students from taking more than one online course at a time.

    The rush of Indian students to such a new college would have raised concerns among American consular officials in India if they had seen a flood of visa requests from admitted Tri-Valley students. But the university exploited a rule that allows students to gain admission to one college, secure a visa, then transfer to another without ever setting foot on the first campus. The Indian government found that only 100 students had been granted visas directly from U.S. Consulates in India to attend Tri-Valley.

    The chinks in the student-visa system reflect its unusual history. Following the attacks of September 11, 2001, the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, designed to better track foreign students in the United States, was hastily approved as part of the USA Patriot Act. In creating Sevis, as it’s known, lawmakers adopted existing language in which accreditation had never been required for a school or college to admit foreign students, even though it is necessary to participate in other programs, like federal financial aid. The focus was—and still is—on keeping terrorists, not questionable colleges, out of the higher-education system.

    In recruiting Indian students, Tri-Valley discovered what others already knew: That India is ripe for exploiting Sevis loopholes, in part because of the sheer number of students there who want to come to the United States. Indians have also proved receptive to these pitches because, although the country has a burgeoning middle class, many of its students still need to work to afford an American university degree.

    Tri-Valley became very successful very quickly. The university was started with a $5,000 investment in 2008 and approved by the government to admit international students a year later. By 2010, it was bringing in more than $4-million, according to government estimates—though if Ms. Su’s claim of 5,000 students and alumni is accurate, the revenue may have been much higher. Ms. Su had upgraded her lifestyle in accordance with the university’s newfound affluence. She purchased a 6,384-square-foot house in December for $1.8-million and made the 15-minute drive to Tri-Valley’s headquarters in a Mercedes-Benz.

    Before she started the university, Ms. Su seemed like a young academic on the rise. In 2001, she earned a doctorate in mechanical engineering from the University of California at Berkeley, and she published articles in a number of peer-reviewed journals. On the Tri-Valley Web site, it’s explained that Ms. Su was “traumatized by a bright dream” in which God asked her to created “the 24 degree program,” symbolized by the 24 vertebrae of the human spine. She has not disguised her anger over the closing of the university, calling it “very dreadful” in an e-mail to The Chronicle and comparing the government’s actions to the destruction of the World Trade Center towers.

    One Degree of Separation

    Ms. Su may well have gotten the idea to start Tri-Valley from her former employer, Herguan University, where she worked as an adjunct faculty member. The two Silicon Valley colleges share many similarities: They are unaccredited, enroll mostly Indian students, and, until recently, allowed students to spend most of their time working outside California.

    For a college that says it enrolls about 450 students, the Sunnyvale campus of Herguan, housed in a large, two-story office building, feels eerily unoccupied. There are mazelike hallways of unused classrooms, very little furniture, and a library with mostly empty shelves. On a recent weekday evening, when most classes are supposed to be scheduled, a single class was being held.

    The college, which offers business and computer-science degrees, was founded on the principles of the Herguan Universe Theory, which seeks to explain the workings of the human body, the evolution of all living creatures, and the origin of the universe, according to the creator of the theory and the college’s president, Ying Qiu Wang. During an interview at the college, Mr. Wang held up a book with a galaxy on the cover and said that it contained the secrets of the universe and the keys to the college’s success. He also invited a reporter to become a Herguan student.

    The real key to Herguan’s success, however, lies in the same formula that made Tri-Valley so profitable. In 2008 the college was granted federal approval to accept foreign students. Like Tri-Valley, Herguan submitted to immigration authorities letters from three accredited colleges promising to accept its course credits. A Herguan official pointed to two colleges that accept its credits, Silicon Valley University and Northwestern Polytechnic University.

    But representatives at those colleges say they never wrote such a letter. And Mikhail Brodsky, president of Lincoln University, an accredited college in Oakland, said Herguan officials offered to write him a check in return for his college’s support. (Herguan officials did not respond to requests for comment on that accusation).

    Last semester, most Herguan students worked full-time jobs outside California while enrolled in online classes, according to Jerry Wang, Herguan’s chief executive. The arrangement would appear to violate a federal requirement that foreign students must be full-time students and may not take more than one online class per semester. But Mr. Wang said he considers students’ bosses temporary Herguan faculty members. When students work in New York, Virginia, and other states, they earn academic credit for what are technically considered on-campus internship classes, he explained.

    Four current or former Herguan employees said that failing students have routinely been given passing grades in exchange for paying extra money. In a July e-mail reviewed by The Chronicle, Mr. Wang allows one student living in Chicago to earn three credits in return for paying $225 and taking a single online test. Numerous follow up calls to Herguan administrators over several weeks were not returned.

    Herguan’s methods have drawn the attention of federal officials, who visited the campus in November. On December 1, Mr. Wang e-mailed all Herguan students to say they were required to move to California within a week and take in-person classes, or else the college would move to terminate their student visas. The message blamed the decision on widespread cheating by online Herguan students.

    The instructions were met with anger and disbelief. “It’s not possible for many of us to go to California in such short notice,” one student, Navaneetha Myaka, e-mailed her computer-science class. A week later, Mr. Wang apologized and offered students $500 if they came back for just six days of class. But the damage was done. Mr. Wang says a quarter of Herguan’s students have since transferred to other colleges.

    Some of them enrolled in International Technological University, just down the road from Herguan.

    The college opened in 1994 with the goal of becoming the largest university in the world. It had a rough start, losing its accreditation, nearly going bankrupt, and dwindling, by 2006, to a mere 18 students.

    Then officials hit upon on a new strategy: promising foreign students that they could work full-time jobs off-campus as soon as they arrived. They also offered existing students a $500 tuition rebate for each new student they referred. Business took off.

    The college gained a reputation in online forums used by Indian students as a good place to go to extend a student visa, or to get a job in lieu of obtaining an H-1B visa, which typically allows college-educated professionals to work in the United States for three years. Enrollment has since jumped to more than 1,500 students—94 percent from India—and the college has become very profitable. ITU’s provost, Gerald A. Cory, earned $445,832 in 2009, more than was earned by the provosts of Yale, Brown, or Berkeley.

    Many ITU students have an unusual schedule: They attend each class only three weekends per semester, all day Saturday and Sunday. That allows some of them to work full-time jobs in New York, Ohio, and other states and fly back to California when needed. They earn academic credit for the jobs, as well as the classes, and ITU considers them full-time students.

    Weekend-only students can gain valuable work skills that traditional colleges often ignore, says Mikel Duffy, the college’s associate vice president. He says college officials explained all this to federal investigators when they showed up unannounced late last year, shortly before they shut down Tri-Valley.

    The investigators seemed to leave satisfied, Mr. Duffy says, and ITU continues to thrive. On a recent day in February, scores of Indian students jostled for space at ITU’s registration desk, checks and paperwork in hand. Signed photos of former American presidents lined the walls. The prospective students were friendly but nervous; many of them were trying to transfer from Tri-Valley.

    Unlike Tri-Valley, Mr. Duffy explains, ITU, which offers mainly computer-science and M.B.A. programs, has never offered any online classes because it would be too easy to violate federal rules.

    But ITU’s own Web site mentioned an online M.B.A. course as recently as July 2008, and some students continue to take classes entirely online, according to interviews with professors, recruiters, and students.

    Tom Taylor, who teaches graduate-level business courses at the college, says some of his students have lived in other parts of the country and use a “cybercampus” to take tests and submit final projects. “I have had students outside California, but I hold them to high standards,” Mr. Taylor says.

    Mr. Duffy says students have, at times, mistaken ITU’s weekend classes for online classes, but that attendance is mandatory. In fact, in order to accommodate the college’s growth, he says, the campus is moving this month to a larger building in downtown San Jose, across the street from tech giant Adobe Systems.

    “It’s Silicon Valley,” Mr. Duffy says. “This is how start-ups are born.”

    $10-Million a Year

    More than 30 students are squeezed into a classroom at the University of Northern Virginia, located in a series of office buildings in the suburbs of Washington. Soft drinks have been provided, along with bags of chips, a bowl of salsa, and dozens of cupcakes. But the students, all of them Indian, aren’t interested in the snacks. They have heard about the federal raid at Tri-Valley and have one question: Will their university be next?

    In an attempt to reassure them, Northern Virginia’s chancellor, David V. Lee, explains how the university was extremely careful to follow regulations. He concedes that there had been trouble in the past. A recruiter working for the college in India was “throwing I-20′s up into the air and letting the wind blow them around,” Mr. Lee tells the students. He clarifies later that the recruiter was encouraging applicants to falsify the I-20 immigration documents so they could come to the United States. That recruiter, he says, was let go.

    The students seem unsatisfied, grilling officials on the details of the university’s compliance with immigration law. Their suspicions are understandable: Northern Virginia’s business model looks a lot like Tri-Valley’s.

    The heart of that model, according to Daniel Ho, its founder and the majority owner, is its ability to enroll foreign students in the United States. Nearly all of its students are here on visas, and the vast majority are from India. Like Tri-Valley, Northern Virginia has students who live in other states, some as far away as New York and Ohio, but university officials insist that, unlike Tri-Valley, those students—most of whom study computer science or business administration—commute regularly to Virginia to attend classes.

    Still, much of how the university operates remains unclear. When asked how many students it has, Mr. Lee answers “between 1,000 and 2,000.” According to Virginia government records, the university had 1,216 students this past fall, but that doesn’t take into account the thousands of students working toward Northern Virginia degrees overseas.

    How many other so-called partner institutions award University of Northern Virginia degrees? Mr. Lee says the number is four. Mr. Ho says it’s more than 20, though he doesn’t know the exact figure. He says the university graduates students everywhere in the world except for South America and Australia. They have, according to Mr. Ho, more than 2,000 students in China alone.

    “We are very big,” Mr. Ho says with understandable pride.

    Daniel Ho is an engaging, energetic presence who’s in his mid-50s but seems younger. He is also an entrepreneur with a hand in multiple businesses. Recently he sat down with a reporter in his corner office at UNVA, offering his guest lemon tea and imported pineapple pastries. Mr. Ho is knowledgeable about a range of foodstuffs, in part because he owns three grocery stores in the Washington metropolitan area. The headquarters of his grocery business, Super Q Mart International Food, is in the same building as the university.

    Until 2008, UNVA was accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, which is federally recognized. That accreditation was revoked, though neither the university nor the council would say why. The university now claims accreditation from the little-known American University Accreditation Council, which is not recognized by the Department of Education. The accreditor, however, has a professional-looking Web site featuring a photograph of new graduates, dressed in caps and gowns, holding their diplomas aloft in front of a billowing American flag. The site also has a photo of a modern office building, presumably its headquarters.

    But drive to the address on the contact page and instead you’ll find a bustling auto-body repair shop. That shop, it turns out, is owned by Gary Zhu, acting chairman of the board at UNVA. Reached at the Szechuan-style restaurant he also owns, Mr. Zhu said he’s never attended a board meeting held by American University Accreditation Council, though he did agree to serve on the board. When asked who runs the accreditor, he named Mr. Ho.

    Mr. Ho says that’s not true. When told that the electronic file containing the accreditor’s by-laws appears to have been created by him in July 2009, Mr. Ho acknowledges writing the by-laws but says that was the extent of his involvement. He says he hasn’t been in touch with his university’s accreditor in years and can’t name anyone who works there. He is surprised to learn that the headquarters was an auto-body repair shop.

    The university says that 357 foreign students are working while attending Northern Virginia; four of those students work in the accounting department at Mr. Ho’s grocery business. While he won’t say exactly how much his university earns, he hints that revenue is well above $10-million a year.

    “It is very profitable,” Mr. Ho says, leaning back in his chair. “Very profitable.”

    So who is regulating UNVA? In granting approval to admit international students, the federal government relies, in part, on an individual state’s certification that a college meets its requirements to operate.

    But even Mr. Ho admits that the agency in Virginia that oversees colleges is “not tough,” though he contends that California is even more lenient. Besides, according to Virginia officials, the state has no authority over the programs the university runs outside its borders. When asked if he could simply sell degrees overseas, Mr. Ho responds, “absolutely” but argues vigorously that he would never endanger his reputation by doing so.

    “I can sell degrees. I can sell diplomas. But I won’t,” he says. “Who’s going to supervise me, control me? Myself.”

    The Godfather of ‘Work Study’

    Zhi Zhang never planned to work at Wal-Mart. But when she first arrived at Lincoln University, in Oakland, Calif., to earn a master’s degree in business administration, she applied for every job she could find. At her first job, running a cash register at a Six Flags gift shop, most of her colleagues were high-school students. When a manager from Wal-Mart called, she jumped at the opportunity to get a reliable full-time job.

    Ms. Zhang had earned a bachelor’s degree in telecommunications engineering from Sun Yat-Sen University, ranked as one of the top colleges in China. She says she wanted to study and work in the United States to improve her career prospects when she returned to China, and she chose Lincoln because it was easy to gain admission and close to San Francisco.

    Ms. Zhang was unimpressed by Lincoln when she arrived. The college, unlike Tri-Valley, is accredited and holds regular classes. But it is a modest operation, offering a handful of mostly business degrees out of a former bank building in downtown Oakland. Open spaces have been converted to three floors of offices, classrooms, and a student center in the basement.

    “To be honest, the first day I saw the campus, I was thinking: Wow, even my primary school is bigger than that,” Ms. Zhang said.

    She spent her first months behind a Wal-Mart cash register in utter confusion. Her English was poor, she says, and the customers asked for items that don’t exist in China: spaghetti, cheese, and endless canned food. “Wal-Mart customers are not very patient, actually,” Ms. Zhang says. She remembers wandering down the aisles memorizing the names of obscure tinned meats. But after three months she was promoted to a customer-service manager.

    Ms. Zhang is authorized to work in the United States through Curricular Practical Training, the same program that Herguan, ITU, and other colleges use to allow foreign students to take off-campus jobs. The training was designed as a way to give students practical internship experience that is “integral” or “directly related” to their areas of study, according to federal regulations.

    Without such work authorization, educators say, foreign students wouldn’t be able to enroll in majors with hands-on requirements, like nursing, and could be at a disadvantage compared with their American peers in competing for résumé-burnishing internships.

    The federal government leaves it to colleges to determine what kind of training is integral to a student’s course of study and where they can work. Its main requirement is that students complete a full academic year before starting to work.

    Most accredited colleges interpret CPT quite narrowly, allowing it in only a small number of degree programs or with strict academic-adviser approval and supervision: Just 2 percent of Portland State University’s international students are currently authorized for Curricular Practical Training, and at Florida Atlantic University, a mere dozen students, out of a foreign-student body of 650, are approved to work this semester.

    While college officials worry that they could overstep the intentions of the CPT program, they don’t want to change the regulation to give U.S. Immigration more say.

    “Historically, the federal government doesn’t regulate curriculum, least of all the Department of Homeland Security,” says Victor C. Johnson, senior adviser for public policy at Nafsa: Association of International Educators. “Let’s fix other things first.”

    But the vagueness of the rule has opened the door to interpretations that few institutions say they would endorse. Tri-Valley and others allowed graduate students to begin working full-time jobs immediately. They also have very flexible definitions of relevant work experience. Lincoln officials say Ms. Zhang’s work at Wal-Mart gives her management experience related to her M.B.A. Tri-Valley approved its students to work at a dollar store and a tobacco shop. Herguan officials say it would be fine for a student to manage a convenience store.

    Curricular Practical Training has been an option for colleges for many years, but it has been only in the last few years that some colleges have built their business on the promise that students can work more than they go to class.

    How did institutions as far away as California and Virginia come up with such an idea roughly around the same time? They listened to Fred Brandenfels.

    A dozen years ago, Mr. Brandenfels, a retired lawyer in Oregon, was perusing student-visa regulations when he noticed that a handful of colleges offered CPT to graduate students from the get-go, making use of an exception to the rule that requires students to spend a year in college before they can work off-campus. The programs were in areas like nursing and teaching, and they required internships from the start of instruction.

    Mr. Brandenfels wondered if such “work mandatory” programs could apply to fields like computer science that are popular with foreign students interested in hands-on training. The answer, from the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, which then oversaw student-visa issues, was yes.

    Mr. Brandenfels became a kind of godfather of CPT-mandatory institutions, counseling some dozen colleges on how to set up academic programs or courses in which work is required, mostly—following the dot-com bust—in business. His company, HTIR Work-Study USA, has advised the University of Northern Virginia. It also maintains a network of roughly 60 international recruiters and sends students—including a quarter of Lincoln’s student body—to colleges in return for a portion of their tuition.

    His students, he says, are carefully screened, serious about returning to their home countries, and wouldn’t have a chance at an American education without the extra money their internships provide.

    “We have the program everybody wants,” he says. “It’s like winning the lottery.”

    At the same time, Mr. Brandenfels calls HTIR “an international employment agency,” and its Web site lists jobs students have held, from an engineer at an information-technology company to sales associates at Baskin-Robbins, Best Buy, and Target. All are relevant to students’ degree programs, Mr. Brandenfels and his staff members say. Acceptable jobs for graduate business students include “anything that runs a business or has money exchanged,” says Carmen Slack, an HTIR employment coordinator.

    Many foreign students seem to agree. In more than a dozen interviews, students at these institutions say that an American degree, any American degree, will help them get a better job or earn a promotion back home. They say they choose these unaccredited colleges for their flexibility, their low cost, academic quality and because of the recommendations of other students from their home region. In online forums, students are more blunt: What they actually talk about is who will let them work “from Day 1.”

    ‘Ripe for Abuse’

    Homeland-security officials say they are not blind to the existence of other Tri-Valleys, although they wouldn’t comment on, or even confirm, current investigations. And they concede that regulations governing foreign-student employment are vulnerable to exploitation. “These areas are ripe for abuse,” says a top administrator with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which monitors 10,300 schools and colleges that grant visa documents. “We look very closely.”

    Officials say that the agency is doing the best it can, given its resources and authority. An increase in Sevis fees—the system is entirely self-financed—will support the creation of a new enforcement unit focused solely on school and college violations and allow for the creation of a 60-person team of regionally based liaisons to act as contacts and more closely monitor colleges on the ground. Within the next couple of years, Homeland Security also hopes to roll out a new version of the Sevis database with greater data-tracking capabilities and fraud-detection features built in.

    Still, the agency has limited latitude to act, even when it knows of problems. For example, officials have no authority to sanction colleges like Tri-Valley that continue to admit students above the number they were authorized to take in. The department can’t even remove colleges from its list of certified institutions without going through a protracted withdrawal process—even when, as in Tri-Valley’s case, fraud charges have been brought against them.

    Such changes can be made only through a multiyear regulatory process—or through legislation. The Department of Homeland Security cannot lobby for legislative action and has not sought to require accreditation among Sevis participants. Indeed, the department has argued that such restrictions could harm small operators.

    A group of U.S. senators this month asked Homeland Security officials to visit colleges deemed high risk within the next year. Legislators were also outraged at violations found during earlier raids on English-language schools. But they haven’t changed the system.

    Without eliminating the loopholes that allowed Tri-Valley to thrive, such as the ambiguity in work rules and the ease with which students can transfer from legitimate institutions to shoddy ones, shuttering one questionable college does little to prevent another from simply springing up in its place, competing for students who, at the very least, are interested in a cheaper and easier route to an American degree and an American job.

    In some instances, government action may have exacerbated weaknesses. Until a few years ago, foreign students were required to spend a semester on the campus they first enrolled in before being allowed to transfer to another institution. But the Department of Homeland Security has changed those rules, allowing students to transfer immediately after securing their visas. Those students have become known among established colleges as “runners.”

    Chief among the system’s shortcomings, many argue, is the fact that institutions like Tri-Valley can receive certification at all.

    “That’s where the inherent flaw is,” says Ronald B. Cushing, director of international services at the University of Cincinnati. “What are we doing, closing down these institutions years later, when they shouldn’t have been allowed in the system in the first place?”

    Mr. Cushing and others say that only accredited colleges should be allowed to take in foreign students, or that certification should include a more-rigorous peer review, akin to accreditation. The retired police officers and FBI agents who conduct site visits, they say, aren’t equipped to assess an institution’s academic quality. But immigration officials have resisted efforts to require accreditation.

    Bad actors affect more than just the students they enroll. The closing of Tri-Valley has raised doubts in India about the quality and oversight of American higher education, and further closures could damage that reputation even more. Indian newspapers painted the Tri-Valley students as victims. After some were made to wear electronic-monitoring devices, headlines screamed, “We are being treated like dogs” and “Uncle Sam wants you to wear a radio collar.”

    If families in India—which sends nearly 105,000 students to the United States each year—lose faith in the system, that could affect all higher-education institutions in the United States, not just the unaccredited operators.

    The tensions are continuing to play out. When the four former Tri-Valley students were interrogated at the immigration office in Northern Virginia, federal agents seemed skeptical that they really were victims. They must have realized, one agent told them, that Tri-Valley wasn’t what it claimed. The students responded that Tri-Valley had approval from U.S. immigration services. How were they supposed to know it wasn’t operating within the bounds of the law if the government didn’t?

    After hours of questioning, one of the four was arrested and released on his own recognizance. He will have to appear in front of an immigration judge. After his release, the student seemed to be in shock, muttering that his life had been ruined. Once outside the building, he put his hand over his face and began to weep.

    As for the three other former Tri-Valley students, one will be attending the University of Northern Virginia. The other two are enrolled at nearby University of North America, located on the second floor of a Wachovia bank building.

    The university barely existed just a few months ago, with fewer than two dozen students. Now it may enroll as many as 75 former Tri-Valley students. It has three closet-size classrooms, a small computer lab, and a skeleton staff. The university has not applied for accreditation yet, though officials say they plan to soon.

    It has, however, already been approved to admit foreign students by the federal government.


    Hispanics Lead U.S. Population Growth – WSJ.com

    March 25th, 2011

    Hispanics Lead U.S. Population Growth – WSJ.com.

    In a demographic shift touching every corner of the U.S., the Hispanic population grew faster than expected and accounted for more than half of the nation’s growth over the past decade, with the group’s increase driven by births and immigration.

    The Census Bureau—in its first nationwide demographic tally from the 2010 headcount—said Thursday the U.S. Hispanic population surged 43%, rising to 50.5 million in 2010 from 35.3 million in 2000. Latinos now constitute 16% of the nation’s total population of 308.7 million.

    The Census Bureau has estimated that the non-Hispanic white population would drop to 50.8% of the total population by 2040—then drop to 46.3% by 2050. This demographic transformation—Latinos now account for about one in four people under age 18—holds the potential to shift the political dynamics across the country.

    “The Hispanic population is under-represented in the electorate and politically because of demographic factors,” including the high share under age 18 and the high number of immigrants, said Jeffrey Passel, a demographer at the Pew Hispanic Center. “Their presence in the electorate will increase over time.”

    Nearly 92% of the nation’s population growth over the past decade—25.1 million people—came from minorities of all types, including those who identified themselves as mixed race. Nine million people, or 3%, reported more than one race.

    In addition to the 16.3% of people who identified as Hispanic or Latino of any race, 63.7% identified as white; 12.2% identified as black; 4.7% as Asian; and 0.7% as American Indians or Alaska Natives. Other races made up the rest.

    States in the South and West posted the sharpest growth rates during the decade, with the population of the West surpassing the Midwest for the first time. More than half the U.S. lived in the 10 most populous states, with about a quarter in the three largest states: California, Texas and New York.

    The Census Bureau said the population continued shifting toward the South and West, which together accounted for 84% of the decade’s population growth. The nation’s center of population—the balancing point if all 308 million people weighed the same—moved about 25 miles south to just outside Plato, Mo. In 1790, the year of the first Census, the population center was near Chestertown, Md.

    The Census data also showed blacks moving out of big cities in the North and into suburbs and the South, marking more black-white integration.

    Two cities, New York and Washington, saw their black populations decline. The District of Columbia notched its first decennial population increase since the 1940s, rising to 601,700 despite an 11% drop in blacks. But the non-Hispanic black population in the nation’s capital was just 50% in 2010, as the non-Hispanic white population jumped almost a third to 209,000.

    New York City’s population inched up 2.1%, bringing the 2010 total to 8.2 million. The city’s non-Hispanic black population declined for the first time since 1860, according to William Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution. While not substantial, the 5.1 % decline is in line with other urban centers that posted declines, Mr. Frey said. New York City’s growth was fueled by increases in its Asian and Hispanic populations. The city’s white population fell slightly, by 2.8%.

    “We’ve moved to an African-American population that, at least for a lot of young people, is becoming much more mainstream than 20 years ago in terms of where they want to live and how they see themselves in American life,” Mr. Frey said. “It’s affecting the way suburbs are growing. It’s changing the way the South is growing.”

    The increasing racial diversity among U.S. children underscored a shift that is likely to make whites a minority in the early 2040s. Of the entire Hispanic population, children make up about one-third, compared with one-fifth among whites.

    The total number of people under age 18 rose by nearly two million over the decade. But the number of white children fell, while the number of Hispanic children rose sharply. During the decade, Texas alone added 979,000 individuals under age 18, of which 931,000 were Hispanic.

    “That can tell you as much as anything how important Hispanics are for the future of children in the United States,” Mr. Frey said. Of the states gaining people, “they owe it to Hispanics.”

    Latinos moved increasingly into such states as Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky and Maryland. North Carolina and other states that previously had smaller Hispanic populations saw similar growth—a trend demographers say is likely to continue in the next decade. “The migration streams that have been established tend to be somewhat self-reinforcing,” Mr. Passel said. “Once a migration stream gets established to a new place, more migrants tend to go there.”


    Immigrants in the Military

    March 24th, 2011

    The United States military is composed entirely of volunteers. While individuals are paid for their service, the decision join the military is entirely voluntary. The branches of the United States military include the Army, Air Force, Navy, Coast Guard and the Marines. In general each branch has different requirements for enlistment, but there are some standard requirements for all the branches. Only individuals who are U.S. citizens can become commissioned officers in the United States military. Those who are considered US citizens also include citizens of Puerto Rico, the Northern Marianas Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Non-citizens are eligible to enlist in the military but can not be commissioned. A non-citizen that is eligible to join the military must meet certain requirements: (1) Have an Alien Registration Receipt Card (stamped I-94 or I-551 Green card/INS Form 1-551), (2) Have a bonafide residence established, and (3) Have established a record of the U.S. as their home. Some non-citizens from countries with a reputation of hostility towards the U.S. may also require a waiver. The federal government cannot petition on behalf of an illegal immigrant so that they can obtain legal status and be able to enlist in the military. In order for an immigrant to join the United States military, they must first go through the immigration process of the USCIS and then and then begin the enlisting process. Another requirement is that the Green Card and/or visa if the immigrant desiring to join the military must be valid for the entire period of their enlistment.

    Being a U.S. Citizen or legal immigrant of the United States is only one of the basic requirements to join the U.S. military. Applicants must also pass a physical exam. The military will take only those in relatively good health, but in certain cases the military may make some exceptions for some conditions and issue a waiver. In order to be considered for the military, applicants must obtain a minimum score on the ASVAB (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) test. Those entering any military branch must be a minimum of 17 years of age. However, at 17 the recruit is still considered a minor, so authorization of the recruit’s parents or guardian must be obtained. The maximum age limit varies depending on the specific branch so it is recommended to check with the recruiters. The number of dependents a potential military recruit has is also another factor that is considered by all military branches. As a general rule, the Department of Defense does not allow an applicant that has more than two dependents to enlist in any branch. The U.S. military considers dependents to be: spouses, unmarried children under 18, unmarried adopted children under 18, stepchildren under 18 who reside at their home, and a parent or other individual who obtains more than half of their income from the applicant. At times, the military branches can override this requirement and issue a waiver but it is something that is not done often. The military applicant must be able to show that they can meet their financial obligations for the waiver to be granted. For the most part, single parents are not allowed to join the military. The only exception is made by the Army National Guard and the State Adjutant General must grant the waiver.

    Applicants, including immigrants who wish to become part of the U.S. military, must meet minimal education requirements. The military branches usually require a high school diploma, but some exceptions are made. Each branch is only allowed to take a certain percentage of applicants without high school diplomas. However, this percentage is relatively small. In addition, those applicants without a high school diploma are required to score a minimum ASVAB score. Individuals who enlist in the military and are non-citizens, are limited to one service term. If non-citizens become U.S. citizens then they are permitted to reenlist. For an immigrant who joined the US. military, once they are in active duty status in the military, the process of going from a non-citizen to U.S. citizen can be expedited. It is important to note is that non-citizens, or immigrants, who enlist in the military will also have limited job choices. The Department of Defense (DOD) does not currently allow non-citizens in the military to take on job choices that require a security clearance. All branches of the U.S. military have slightly different requirements so check with the recruiters. With these considerations in mind, immigrants seeking to join the military are encouraged to speak with their local recruiter.


    Visa scam: Many others like TVU, says report – Rediff.com India News

    March 24th, 2011

    Visa scam: Many others like TVU, says report – Rediff.com India News.

    A visa scam at Tri Valley University in California, that has affected hundreds of Indian students, is just the tip of the iceberg and a large number of such institutes exit in the United States, a probe report has said. “Other colleges – most of them unaccredited – exploit intricate federal regulations, enrolling almost exclusively foreign students and charging them upward of $3,000 for a chance to work legally in the US,” said the report released by Chronicle of Higher Education.

    Such educational institutes flourish in California and Virginia, where regulations are lax, and many of their practices — for instance, holding some classes on only three weekends per semester—are unconventional, to say the least, the report added. “These colleges usher in thousands of foreign students and generate millions of dollars in profits because they have the power, bestowed by the US government, to help students get visas,” it said.

    “While these institutions are well-known among Indian students looking to work full time, they have managed to go mostly unnoticed in the US,” it said.

    In more than a dozen interviews to Chronicle, students at these institutions say that an American degree, any American degree, will help them get a better job or earn a promotion back home, the report said. “They say they choose these unaccredited colleges for their flexibility, their low cost, academic quality and because of the recommendations of other students from their home region,” it said.

    “In online forums, students are more blunt: What they actually talk about is who will let them work ‘from Day 1′,” it said. According to the report, homeland-security officials say they are not blind to the existence of other Tri-Valleys, although they wouldn’t comment on, or even confirm, current investigations.

    They concede that regulations governing foreign-student employment are vulnerable to exploitation. “These areas are ripe for abuse,” said a top administrator with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which monitors 10,300 schools and colleges that grant visa documents.

    “An increase in Student and Exchange Visitor Information System fees — the system is entirely self-financed — will support the creation of a new enforcement unit focused solely on school and college violations and allow for the creation of a 60-person team of regionally based liaisons to act as contacts and monitor colleges on the ground more closely,” the report said.

    According to a federal complaint filed in a California court in January, the TVU had helped foreign nationals, mostly Indians, illegally acquire immigration status. The university is said to have 1,555 students. As many as 95 per cent of these students are Indian nationals. The university was closed on charges of massive visa fraud.


    Why Minority Entrepreneurs Matter In America – Forbes.com

    March 24th, 2011

    Why Minority Entrepreneurs Matter In America – Forbes.com.

     

     

    When Fidel Castro seized his cattle ranches in 1966, Domingo Diaz fled to Atlanta, where he scraped together a living mopping floors as a janitor. Eventually he saved enough to buy a grocery store downtown, where he and his son, Julio, sold Cuban specialties. Over the next decade they added four more stores. It was a family affair: Julio’s son, Rene, learned math running the checkout counter, and at age 15 he learned to drive (and haggle) by going to the market to buy produce to stock the shelves.

    Today Rene Diaz runs Diaz Foods, which generates $200 million in sales transporting mostly Hispanic food products to restaurants and grocery stores in 25 states. The Diaz family now includes 370 employees representing “every single Latin country,” crows Rene Diaz, 49. “At least ten couples have met here, gotten married and stayed at Diaz Foods. And I can’t even count how many family members work here.”

    Minority entrepreneurs like Diaz are playing a bigger role in America’s growth story. In 2010 immigrants accounted for nearly 30% of new business owners, versus 13% in 1996, according to the Kauffman Foundation. Atlanta, with its sprawling suburbs and endless strip malls, is an especially active hive.

    Since the 1980s Atlanta’s Hispanic population has swelled, drawn from recession-wracked places like Texas and California. The 1996 Summer Olympics brought more construction and service jobs to the city. In the last decade the city, where half the residents are African American, has attracted a host of Hispanic and Asian entrepreneurs, and now boasts the second-highest percentage of self-employed minorities among the top 52 metropolitan areas with populations greater than 1 million. That–combined with a growing population, increasing household incomes and affordable housing–puts Atlanta atop our list of best metro areas for minority entrepreneurs, cobbled together with help from economist-demographer Joel Kotkin, author of The Next Hundred Million: America in 2050.

    Diaz’s market is vast–and expanding. Between 2000 and 2009 disposable income among U.S. Hispanics grew at an 8% clip, to nearly $1 trillion, versus 4.7% growth in overall GDP. Better yet, “Hispanics tend to buy from Hispanics,” says Luz Urrutia, president of El Banco de Nuestra Comunidad in Atlanta. Diaz has spent $250,000 on software to track purchasing trends and fields a team of six analysts to research new products appealing to a variety of cultures.

    Mexicans, for example, tend to be brand loyalists, says Diaz. That’s why he struck an exclusive deal with Jarritos, a Mexican soda company, in 2008, which helped shore up sales in the latest downturn. “We were able to land customers who weren’t buying from us before,” says Liliana Bejarano, Diaz Foods’ vice president of business intelligence. The company now stocks seven different nectars, three of them (Sonrisa, Jumex and Boing) for customers hailing from different parts of Mexico. Diaz also ships five kinds of black beans. “They’re the same black beans,” he says. “But Hispanics want their black beans.” (Colombians, on the other hand, couldn’t care less about labels. “If a Colombian company says they have the most famous rice, I’ll say: ‘What’s the price?’” quips Bejarano, who formerly worked for McKinsey in Colombia.)

    Twenty years ago Diaz Foods had a tiny $25,000 line of credit. Each morning Diaz would call his local bank to find out how much his account was overdrawn and then ask his drivers to pick up money from customers and deposit cash somewhere along the route. Today that line is $11 million.

    Diaz still lives on low-single-digit operating margins–an even tougher game when commodity prices spike. In the last few months gasoline jumped $1 to nearly $4 a gallon, adding $25,000 more to Diaz’s fuel bill every week. “We need to get more penetration into existing customers rather than knocking on doors of new ones,” he says.

    More nettlesome, Georgia has become a battleground for immigration reform. One bill, put forth by Representative Matt Ramsey (R-Ga.), would force companies to use a federal database to confirm an employee’s eligibility and also would allow police officers to ask for proof of citizenship during traffic stops.

    Diaz says all his workers are legit and that most endure background checks. “There might be someone here who has fake paperwork,” admits CFO Eric Newberg, “but we can’t do anything more than follow the laws.” For extra measure last year Diaz hired a firm to conduct an I-9 employee-eligibility audit, just the second such review in the company’s history.


    Visit Diaz’s 250,000-square-foot warehouse just west of downtown Atlanta and the beaming owner can barely contain his pride. Latin American artwork adorns the walls. Diaz’s employees have health insurance, access to an onsite gym (with yoga and Zumba classes), a 401(k) plan with matching contributions and subsidized lunch spreads five days a week, including strip steaks, paella and plantains.

    Diaz insists relatives don’t get special treatment at the company. Nor, he adds, does he intend to walk away from what his grandfather started anytime soon: “I don’t run it like a family business, but I always want it to be a privately held business with family values.”


    6 of the world’s 10 best universities are American.

    March 17th, 2011

     

     

    BBC News – World’s best universities ranked by ‘reputation’.

    Harvard University in the United States has been ranked as the university with the best “reputation” in the world.

    The Times Higher Education magazine has listed 200 top universities based on how they are regarded by a panel of international academics.

    In third place, Cambridge is the top rated among UK universities.

    In the wake of the LSE’s embarrassment over links with Libya, reputation has been seen as a valuable but fragile commodity for universities.

    Sir Howard Davies, director of the London School of Economics, stepped down because he feared the institution’s reputation had suffered from the associations with the Gaddafi regime.

    Overseas students

    Global league tables have spread across higher education – and have become important to marketing courses to the three million international students.

    But this latest table is different in that it measures how universities are regarded, rather than how they actually performed.

    A subjective, word-of-mouth quality such as “reputation” has genuine economic value for universities, said Simon Marginson, professor of higher education at the University of Melbourne in Australia.

    “Reputation is not an illusion, though it might be more vulnerable and fragile than performance by objective indicators,” said Prof Marginson.

    Based on the views of 13,000 academics around the world, it confirms the status of the big US universities, which dominate this league table.

    WORLD REPUTATION

    • 1. Harvard
    • 2. MIT
    • 3. Cambridge
    • 4. California, Berkeley
    • 5. Stanford
    • 6. Oxford
    • 7. Princeton
    • 8. Tokyo
    • 9. Yale
    • 10. California Institute of Technology

    Source: Times Higher Education

    Seven of the top 10 are US universities, headed by Harvard and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Furthermore, 14 of the top 20 are from the US.

    Cambridge is the highest ranking UK university in the list, in third place, with Oxford ranked as sixth.

    The LSE, in a table drawn up before its problems with Libya, is in 37th place.

    For students applying to university, reputation might be hard to quantify, but was an important part of the appeal, said the president of Cambridge University’s students’ union, Rahul Mansigani.

    “Reputation makes a huge difference. If there is a perception that somewhere is brilliant, it will get lots of good people applying whether it’s true or not,” he said.

    Factors such as a sense of history and the presence of leading academics were part of the reputation of Cambridge, he said.

    But with worries about university links with dubious regimes, he warned about the need to protect the “moral reputation” of a university.

    “They need to be very wary of who they deal with – with no compromise over academic freedom,” he said.

    Global reach

    Reputation is also a highly valued prize for universities such as MIT, ranked in second place – with particular importance for an institution’s international reach.

    So much so that that they might have a bigger global reputation than in some places nearer home.

    “For a place like MIT, which is primarily about science and technology, reputation is critical,” said Danielle Guichard-Ashbrook, director and associate dean of MIT’s International Students Office.

    “We have a very good reputation in countries that value science and technological education. MIT really resonates in most Asian countries.

    “Whereas you could find a small rural town in the US, where they might not have ever heard of MIT – your average person in China who has had any education will know what it means.”

    Sally Hunt, head of the UCU lecturers’ union in the UK, warned that reputation should not be relied upon as an alternative to financial investment.

    “We will soon get found out if we think we can trade on reputation alone,” she said.

    Phil Baty, editor of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings, said: “In an ever more competitive global market… a university’s reputation for academic excellence is crucial.”


    American Universities Have Major Stake in Immigration Reform, Speaker Says – International – The Chronicle of Higher Education

    March 2nd, 2011

    American Universities Have Major Stake in Immigration Reform, Speaker Says – International – The Chronicle of Higher Education.

    American Universities Have Major Stake in Immigration Reform, Speaker Says

    If the United States doesn’t reform its immigration system, it risks a vast “brain hemorrhage,” as American-educated Indian and Chinese engineers and entrepreneurs return to their own countries, the scholar and entrepreneur Vivek Wadhwa said in a provocative speech on Tuesday at the annual meeting here of the Association of International Education Administrators. And American universities have much at stake in reform, he said.

    Mr. Wadhwa, who holds appointments at Duke University, Harvard Law School, and the University of California at Berkeley, said the United States was squandering the competitive edge of its higher-education system by allowing one million highly educated immigrants to linger in immigration limbo because of tight caps on visas. And that outmigration could eventually affect American universities, rendering them “obsolete,” he said.

    “The United States is headed for massive reverse brain drain,” said Mr. Wadhwa, who is also a columnist for Business Week and an adviser to a number of startup companies.

    “The outflow is happening too fast to be good for the United States,” he said. “It’s happening too much too fast.”

    America’s innovation economy, Mr. Wadhwa pointed out, owes much to imported talent. A quarter of all patent applications filed in this country are the work of foreign nationals.

    From 1995 to 2005, 25 percent of all startup companies had at least one immigrant founder. The number was even higher among new high-tech enterprises—in Silicon Valley, more than half of all companies were started by immigrants. A disproportionate number of startups were founded by immigrants from India, he added.

    But current U.S. immigration policy is hostile to those very entrepreneurs, Mr. Wadhwa said. Each year the United States issues only 65,000 H1-B visas, which allow international workers in certain high-tech and specialty fields to be employed in this country, and the federal government tightly caps the number of green cards granted annually to immigrants from individual countries. More than one million foreigners now in the United States are waiting for one of 120,000 permanent-resident visas issued annually to skilled workers.

    As a consequence, he said, young and well-educated workers from abroad must return to their home countries. The average age of Indians now returning home from America is 30, and Chinese returnees are, on average, 33.

    ‘Get Out of Their Shells’

    American universities are helping fuel the roaring economies overseas, particularly in India, which does not even produce enough engineering doctorates to staff its own universities.

    What’s more, many international students increasingly believe that the “grass is indeed greener back home,” Mr. Wadhwa said.

    Just a few years ago, Mr. Wadhwa said, when he would ask his international students at Duke whether they wanted to stay permanently in the United States, most said they did. Today, he said, most plan to work in this country for just a few years and then return home.

    As part of his research, Mr. Wadhwa used Facebook to poll foreign students at American universities: Fewer than 10 percent of Chinese students and just 6 percent of Indian students surveyed said they wanted to permanently emigrate to the United States.

    Given those trends, Mr. Wadhwa said, a decade from now it’s unlikely that 50 percent of all companies will have immigrant founders, a trend that could pose serious consequences for American competitiveness and innovation.

    “We’re getting more xenophobic, anti-immigrant, just when we need them,” he said of American policy and political rhetoric.

    Mr. Wadhwa also dismissed as “garbage” American academic studies that suggest such competitiveness concerns are overblown.

    American universities, Mr. Wadhwa said, have to “get out of their shells” and become greater advocates for immigration reform. Otherwise, they risk becoming “obsolete.”

    As more well-educated Chinese and Indian nationals opt to return or remain in their home countries, he said, the quality of universities there will improve, making them more competitive on a world stage.

    Over the next decade “Silicon Valley-class universities” will develop in those countries, Mr. Wadhwa said. “American students will want to go there—we’ll be left out.”